People like art students are the most notable advocates for keeping art curriculums in schools. Students with a passion for art will usually gravitate more this subject in schools because it motivates them. My friend Ruby, who was a former student at the Seattle art institute says that it was fine art schools like hers that helped expand her thinking of the world. During her time at the college, she found that taking these classes helped express forms of her emotions that she didnt know she could express. These emotions were not limited to a variety of topics such as her emotions on certain opinions, ideas, events, etc. By expressing her emotions from the things she saw, she was able to interpret that through her paintings, while also subconsciously implementing her idea on the topic as well, ranging from political to racial to gender inequality issues, specifically in the black community. She became greatly invested in these issues which helped shape her into an activist, protesting against these inequalities and wrong-doings. Keep in mind, she doesnt get paid much for her work. Though she doesnt mind it, what matters to her more is the impact she will leave on our culture and society when she publishes her work.
Consequently, over the years, many school boards have decided to implement STEM programs in exchange for cutting funds
for fine art curriculums. STEM is composed of the subjects science, technology, engineering, and math, all of which have become an important factor in AmericaΒs growing economy, which in the long run, help to contribute to the success of Americas future with the next wave of technological thinkers. There were numerous times where Id hear a teacher look down on the value of fine arts. It first started when I was in fifth grade, all I would do all day long was draw and so when I got to middle school, it only made sense that Id also be passionate about pursuing an art-related career, which meant IΒd have to take a lot of art classes. When I told my math teacher at the time that I wanted to go to an art school in the future, he said it isnt a good idea because its not useful to people. When discussing its necessity to the function of society, he says that you can remove art and people can still live their day to day lives. From cartoons to finger painting classes, we can go days without these activities as theyre more of a luxury rather than a necessity. He goes on to say, It may allow expression, but other activities can also persuade individuals. The enjoyment of learning new things, experiences, moments with friends, etc. There are other events to inspire others and give them feelings, leaving art with no room for purpose anymore.