Blog

Reflect on any of the material in Units IV, V. Central Question: In essence, (any Christian thinkers before 1000 AD) (after 1000 AD) Requirements: Each paper should be a that has a goal to examine in light of the specific question for each paper. This is not your answer, but how each author would answer it. State the word length at the end of the paper (“word count= 1500”). Grade based on how well you follow instructions! Select a minimum of [2] primary-source documents [easier if a contrast] from the list on Blackboard HICC 101 course package as a basis to answer the central questions listed below. In other words, answer the question using at the time thought about these issues. Always clearly state your idea first, and then from the source. REMEMBER: the term “quote” should be restricted to a verb form. You are quoting the text, but if you refer to the text, don’t say “In this quote”; refer to the “statement” or “text.” Thus, each paragraph should have ONE IDEA (explain this in several sentences), followed by EVIDENCE (quote the best statement in the text), followed by interpretation and reflection on the meaning of the statement and how it fits with your idea, followed by a brief conclusion on the idea. All quotations from the primary sources must use “ ” [CMS], which is either Footnotes or Endnotes. The new Microsoft Word automatically generates the Chicago format under “References” on the top menu by clicking “Insert Citation” and selecting Style: “Chicago.” One can do this manually by clicking “Insert Footnote” as well. CMS: After quotation marks (which come after the period at the end of the sentence), in Microsoft Word click on “References” above, then “Insert Footnote.” This will automatically insert a “superscript” number and move your cursor to the “foot” of the paper in a footnote. Type your reference there and make sure to end with a period. Then move your cursor back to the text and continue writing. Footnote format= Author’s name (First Last—unless no first), (comma) (italicized), or “title of article” (quotation marks), then source (in most cases you would have selected a text from our course Blackboard site, so the source is SHU Blackboard, page number (just the number, no page or p.), then the

date you accessed this source (all electronic or oral lectures, interviews, with no “hard copy” always need a date—like in a court of law, one always is asked about the date of some occurrence). Example for footnote using source for first time: 3. Homer, , 12, Blackboard, accessed Sept. 12, 2013. Second and following reference use short form: Homer, , 14. Example for bibliography (order source alphabetically, by author’s last name]: Homer. , Book 2. Blackboard, accessed Sept. 12, 2013. You will need to quote the most significant passages in order to support your claims. Keep the length of all quotations to a minimum, and make certain that you interpret and point out the meaning of the text [texts are never obvious]. Quote only what you can explain: quotations are only evidence for the points you already make! In order to reflect on a document you will have to quote it several times. ; they only teach you the material so you can find evidence in published texts, like your text book, which you can choose to quote in a limited way, but is not necessary. This assignment is of the primary sources (thus: ), and always interpret and explain the quotation in light of the idea that you have made. A good paragraph (in a nut shell) has one central idea, the idea is explained, then evidence is suggested (quote), then interpretation, then conclusion of the idea. —————————————– Try to pick up 2 authors and compare and talk about them: The writings chosen for this unit show the breakdown of Christendom and the rise of new and diverse ideas in politics, economics and religion.They also show the development of the individual and knowledge of self, new methods to discern reality, and the recurring theme of the attempt–already shown in Early Christianity–to reconcile ancient wisdom (Greek philosophy) with Christian theology. — used the model of education of his time in his : (i.e. questions debated). Students would take each side of an issue, formulate a question, and provide arguments or objections for each side. The “master” (professor of the time) would evaluate each argument and give a ruling (respond) on how well each was argued, pointing out problems. This follows an inductive method as well. Note the format when you read Aquinas.