Bismarck didnt align with traditional conservatism because of the values in his legislation. Document states that from 869 to 878, Bismarcks government passed laws abolishing restrictions on citizenship because of religion and advocating for the separation of church and state in education. Bismarck was legislating after the Treaty of Westphalia, so he was allowed to dictate the religion of his territory, but he instead chose to further religious toleration, which doesnt align with the conservative character of religious influence in government. Bismarck also seeks to benefit his government in Document 6, where he endorses his bill that insures workers against accidents with the argument that the state has a duty to protect its citizens. Bismarck was supporting his own bill, so he may have been exaggerating his concern with protection by the state to influence the working class. However, he still showed concern with protecting the working class and therefore gaining their loyalty to the state that provides for them. As stated in Document 3 by Hermann Wagener, the influence of the masses including the working class and the army is essential to increasing trust in the government. Hermann Wagener was a conservative, so he may have been trying to further his cause through his emphasis on social reform, but increasing the governments power was essential to Bismarks regime. By putting policies regarding religion and labor laws in place, he aimed to increase his suppo
rt. These methods, as well as Bismarcks devotion to the unification of Germany, show that his ultimate goal was to protect the state and his position as leader, and his ability to do so without using traditional conservativism.
Another reason that Bismarcks government exemplified a new conservatism was that he appealed to many different parties, not just traditional conservatism. This is demonstrated in Document 4, where Bismarck is portrayed as shifting his policy to appeal to liberals, conservatives, and ultramontanes. Bismarck received criticism from both socialists and liberals for aligning with the others ideals. In Document 2, socialist Wilhelm Liebknecht laments that the Reichstag held control over legislation and states that any hope of the SDP influencing the government is pointless. Even though Liebknecht was influenced by his socialist viewpoint, the idea that Bismarck favored certain political parties was also true for liberals. Eugen Richter, a liberal journalist, stated in Document 7 that Bismarcks system of government allowed for the domination of the socialist party and conflict between political ideas. Richter was biased against Bismarck because he was liberal, but the fact that both the socialist and liberal parties in Germany believed that Bismarck favored certain parties shows that his style of government was a new form of conservatism that secured power for the state by not aligning completely with conservative, liberal, or socialist values.